<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Future Takes - Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog</link>
	<description>comments to articles by leading foresight thinkers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:20:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Disbrow</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6919</link>
		<dc:creator>Disbrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6919</guid>
		<description>Once upon a time, there was an intense-argument made by a middle-aged non-Western woman of color to a group of women from the US advocating population-control: &quot;How can anyone argue for population control when everyone knows the most important thing in life is happiness - especially the most important kind of happiness, the kind that comes from being a member of a family, and larger families have a lot more happiness than smaller families? And since being a grandparent is the most fun thing in life, birth control would lead to older people having radically diminished levels of life-happiness.&quot; She then made intense allegations about birth control being another white-societies raciest scheme to destroy the best source of happiness that people of color enjoy - so the racists could once again perpetuate their own materialistic happiness at the expense of the others.

Before population growth overwhelms the world&#039;s carrying capacity, do we not have to deal with the issues raised by her emotional perspective - especially when confronted with this highly intense and personal cross-generational scenario of happiness?

When I first heard this argument 15 or so years ago, I wondered about it - but still couldn&#039;t decide if it were true. Now that I&#039;m a grandparent, let me assure you that being a grandparent is one of the greatest things in life, something that I should have been looking forward to - but didn&#039;t know enough to do so. Is this something that cross-cultural or cross-generational education might have helped? As world cultures interact, how might her culture influence happiness and otherwise influence how G-8 families live, work, think, identify, and relate within the next decade? Maybe we could all have happier lives?

But on top of this, how do we respond to the highly-emotional charge of population-control being a racist plot, when (if you understand her hypothesis and look at world history from her point of view) it could appear to be true? Is this something that cross-cultural education might have helped? or maybe the truth would make it worse? How might the cultures of the G-8 nations draw more effectively on this aspect of the least advanced countries&#039; cultures to best improve the future-focused reform efforts of all, to diminish racism-ethnocentrism, and to share happiness evenly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, there was an intense-argument made by a middle-aged non-Western woman of color to a group of women from the US advocating population-control: &#8220;How can anyone argue for population control when everyone knows the most important thing in life is happiness &#8211; especially the most important kind of happiness, the kind that comes from being a member of a family, and larger families have a lot more happiness than smaller families? And since being a grandparent is the most fun thing in life, birth control would lead to older people having radically diminished levels of life-happiness.&#8221; She then made intense allegations about birth control being another white-societies raciest scheme to destroy the best source of happiness that people of color enjoy &#8211; so the racists could once again perpetuate their own materialistic happiness at the expense of the others.</p>
<p>Before population growth overwhelms the world&#8217;s carrying capacity, do we not have to deal with the issues raised by her emotional perspective &#8211; especially when confronted with this highly intense and personal cross-generational scenario of happiness?</p>
<p>When I first heard this argument 15 or so years ago, I wondered about it &#8211; but still couldn&#8217;t decide if it were true. Now that I&#8217;m a grandparent, let me assure you that being a grandparent is one of the greatest things in life, something that I should have been looking forward to &#8211; but didn&#8217;t know enough to do so. Is this something that cross-cultural or cross-generational education might have helped? As world cultures interact, how might her culture influence happiness and otherwise influence how G-8 families live, work, think, identify, and relate within the next decade? Maybe we could all have happier lives?</p>
<p>But on top of this, how do we respond to the highly-emotional charge of population-control being a racist plot, when (if you understand her hypothesis and look at world history from her point of view) it could appear to be true? Is this something that cross-cultural education might have helped? or maybe the truth would make it worse? How might the cultures of the G-8 nations draw more effectively on this aspect of the least advanced countries&#8217; cultures to best improve the future-focused reform efforts of all, to diminish racism-ethnocentrism, and to share happiness evenly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Art Shostak</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6636</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Shostak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6636</guid>
		<description>Cross-cultural musings have their place, and their distinctive value. Comparably valuable are ongoing reforms that can &quot;travel,&quot; that can cross borders and POSSIBLY make a desired difference in countries other than that of their origin.

Business Week, in the issue of June 13-19, offers a sterling article entitled &quot;Nine Ideas from Around the World to Fix the US Economy.&quot; Peter Coy, the author, contends &quot;the challenge is how to apply lessons from other countries to shore up American weaknesses, without sacrificing the strengths that make the U.S., for all its troubles, the world&#039;s biggest economy.&quot; he goes on to explore &quot;innovative economic ideas in countries as diverse as Germany, Brazil, Singapore, and Thailand that are applicable to America&#039;s mess.&quot;

Long-range forecasters might want to get the World Future Society to maintain a dynamic &quot;inventory&quot; of such ideas - so as to enable members to readily draw on them when helping clients expand their imaginative range - one of the most helpful contributions futurists can offer to those who ask our help.

Only as futurists soar above artificial &quot;fences&quot; that seem to separate cultures - and instead, as in the Business Week article - help in the transfer of good ideas across &quot;fences&quot; - will futurists live up to their potential - and meet a profound responsibility to all.

Art Shostak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cross-cultural musings have their place, and their distinctive value. Comparably valuable are ongoing reforms that can &#8220;travel,&#8221; that can cross borders and POSSIBLY make a desired difference in countries other than that of their origin.</p>
<p>Business Week, in the issue of June 13-19, offers a sterling article entitled &#8220;Nine Ideas from Around the World to Fix the US Economy.&#8221; Peter Coy, the author, contends &#8220;the challenge is how to apply lessons from other countries to shore up American weaknesses, without sacrificing the strengths that make the U.S., for all its troubles, the world&#8217;s biggest economy.&#8221; he goes on to explore &#8220;innovative economic ideas in countries as diverse as Germany, Brazil, Singapore, and Thailand that are applicable to America&#8217;s mess.&#8221;</p>
<p>Long-range forecasters might want to get the World Future Society to maintain a dynamic &#8220;inventory&#8221; of such ideas &#8211; so as to enable members to readily draw on them when helping clients expand their imaginative range &#8211; one of the most helpful contributions futurists can offer to those who ask our help.</p>
<p>Only as futurists soar above artificial &#8220;fences&#8221; that seem to separate cultures &#8211; and instead, as in the Business Week article &#8211; help in the transfer of good ideas across &#8220;fences&#8221; &#8211; will futurists live up to their potential &#8211; and meet a profound responsibility to all.</p>
<p>Art Shostak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Sari Söderlund</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6615</link>
		<dc:creator>Sari Söderlund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6615</guid>
		<description>I think that in the future the selection of cultures will be more heterogeneous and personal selection of IT-connectivity modes compose an integral part of personal appearances. In human beings there are physiological and psychological features that are fairly sustainable by nature. In the future there will be personal selections of connectivity modes that are fairly persistent. However, taking into consideration the whole humankind, emerging personal profiles give heterogeneity of cultures. I am quite positive, since confrontation between cultures and personalities reinforces mutual understanding, trust and acceptance. However there will be small groups expressing movements against harmony co-existence of cultures, but these voices will be weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that in the future the selection of cultures will be more heterogeneous and personal selection of IT-connectivity modes compose an integral part of personal appearances. In human beings there are physiological and psychological features that are fairly sustainable by nature. In the future there will be personal selections of connectivity modes that are fairly persistent. However, taking into consideration the whole humankind, emerging personal profiles give heterogeneity of cultures. I am quite positive, since confrontation between cultures and personalities reinforces mutual understanding, trust and acceptance. However there will be small groups expressing movements against harmony co-existence of cultures, but these voices will be weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Dr. Paul J. Werbos</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6547</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Paul J. Werbos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6547</guid>
		<description>The point you raise is very important. The deep cultural clashes in the world today are
just as important as objective problems, such as dependency on fossil oil and continued population growth, in endangering the human future, especially with possible outcomes like nuclear war.

One important manifestation of these cultural contradictions is between old and new in China,
which spans the whole spectrum. This May (2011) I was grateful to be invited to speak to about 800 people in the main university near the top Confucius Institute of China, in Shandong Province, about how to bridge the gap between modern scientific approaches and older Confucian culture. See
http://www.werbos.com/pi/Confucius_talk.pdf
for the slides.

Best of luck,

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point you raise is very important. The deep cultural clashes in the world today are<br />
just as important as objective problems, such as dependency on fossil oil and continued population growth, in endangering the human future, especially with possible outcomes like nuclear war.</p>
<p>One important manifestation of these cultural contradictions is between old and new in China,<br />
which spans the whole spectrum. This May (2011) I was grateful to be invited to speak to about 800 people in the main university near the top Confucius Institute of China, in Shandong Province, about how to bridge the gap between modern scientific approaches and older Confucian culture. See<br />
<a href="http://www.werbos.com/pi/Confucius_talk.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.werbos.com/pi/Confucius_talk.pdf</a><br />
for the slides.</p>
<p>Best of luck,</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Art Shostak</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6403</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Shostak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6403</guid>
		<description>The June 6th issue of TIME has a very helpful article by Tali Sharot about the Optimism Bias - a faculty of humans, possibly regardless of native culture, to be more optimistic than realistic. 

It would seem from new findings in neuroscience that our brains are wired to accent the glass being half full, and, we even alter our memories to accent the positive in recall. 

Our recognition of our inevitable demise apparently developed alongside of our capacity for mental time travel - that is, an ability to foresee the future(s) and take comfort from knowing there will be a tomorrow for our offspring - even if without us.

For long-term forecasters like ourselves the lesson would seem to be that regardless of the surface differences among cultures the brains of all of are biased in favor of bright expectations - and agents of change can leverage this on behalf of helping people realize their least-worse/best possible imaginings of tomorrow.

Art Shostak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The June 6th issue of TIME has a very helpful article by Tali Sharot about the Optimism Bias &#8211; a faculty of humans, possibly regardless of native culture, to be more optimistic than realistic. </p>
<p>It would seem from new findings in neuroscience that our brains are wired to accent the glass being half full, and, we even alter our memories to accent the positive in recall. </p>
<p>Our recognition of our inevitable demise apparently developed alongside of our capacity for mental time travel &#8211; that is, an ability to foresee the future(s) and take comfort from knowing there will be a tomorrow for our offspring &#8211; even if without us.</p>
<p>For long-term forecasters like ourselves the lesson would seem to be that regardless of the surface differences among cultures the brains of all of are biased in favor of bright expectations &#8211; and agents of change can leverage this on behalf of helping people realize their least-worse/best possible imaginings of tomorrow.</p>
<p>Art Shostak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Art Shostak</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6401</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Shostak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 04:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6401</guid>
		<description>What a wonderful issue to raise in a forum for forecasters! We are inclined to look everywhere but into the heart of the matter - our common core ... regardless of the fact we differ, each one of the billions of us from one another, in body chemistry, and our unique mix of upbringing, social class, religion, race, gender, and other consequential matters. Our common core has existential roots -as we all wrestle across our life span with the SAME &quot;deep&quot; questions that have intrigued philosophers, gurus, mystics, and also YOU and ME across the ages - Why are we here? What are we to do? What does any of it really matter? Why do some good people suffer and terrible people seem to prosper? Why must children die? Why must we die? And do on and so forth.

It behooves long-range forecasters to never lose sight of the ubiquity, fascination, and impact of these unanswerable questions. Tackled in 101 different ways across the cross-cultural range, the questions operate behind the scene to help direct mass movements and the key decisions of lone individuals alike.

Our forecasts are far more reliable when informed by nuanced recognition of, and respectful employ of these soul-stretching quandaries.

Art Shostak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful issue to raise in a forum for forecasters! We are inclined to look everywhere but into the heart of the matter &#8211; our common core &#8230; regardless of the fact we differ, each one of the billions of us from one another, in body chemistry, and our unique mix of upbringing, social class, religion, race, gender, and other consequential matters. Our common core has existential roots -as we all wrestle across our life span with the SAME &#8220;deep&#8221; questions that have intrigued philosophers, gurus, mystics, and also YOU and ME across the ages &#8211; Why are we here? What are we to do? What does any of it really matter? Why do some good people suffer and terrible people seem to prosper? Why must children die? Why must we die? And do on and so forth.</p>
<p>It behooves long-range forecasters to never lose sight of the ubiquity, fascination, and impact of these unanswerable questions. Tackled in 101 different ways across the cross-cultural range, the questions operate behind the scene to help direct mass movements and the key decisions of lone individuals alike.</p>
<p>Our forecasts are far more reliable when informed by nuanced recognition of, and respectful employ of these soul-stretching quandaries.</p>
<p>Art Shostak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Fabienne Goux-Baudiment</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6399</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabienne Goux-Baudiment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6399</guid>
		<description>RE: the progress towards a world culture is predominantly linked to the process of globalisation.
I would have agreed with this statement some years ago. But the paradigm shift that I am discerning now tells me another story, quite well described by Jeremy RIFKIN in The Empathic Civilization. According to J. RIFKIN, we are entering a civilization where empathy will reach its apex, as well as destruction, the other face of this Janusian paradoxe. He considers that this node empathy/entropy is the very core of the dynamic of the human history. And that the slow development of empathy is progressively leading mankind to a &quot;worldization&quot; (in TEILHARD de CHARDIN&#039;s meaning) rather than a globalization as an economic current. And I personally think that the struggle against the entropy generated by current human activity is already significantly contributing to accelerate the pace towards this world culture.

Arab Spring has been possible because of the development of this empathic consciousness, closely linked to core values such as kinship (extended) and asabiyyah (Ibn KHALDUN).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: the progress towards a world culture is predominantly linked to the process of globalisation.<br />
I would have agreed with this statement some years ago. But the paradigm shift that I am discerning now tells me another story, quite well described by Jeremy RIFKIN in The Empathic Civilization. According to J. RIFKIN, we are entering a civilization where empathy will reach its apex, as well as destruction, the other face of this Janusian paradoxe. He considers that this node empathy/entropy is the very core of the dynamic of the human history. And that the slow development of empathy is progressively leading mankind to a &#8220;worldization&#8221; (in TEILHARD de CHARDIN&#8217;s meaning) rather than a globalization as an economic current. And I personally think that the struggle against the entropy generated by current human activity is already significantly contributing to accelerate the pace towards this world culture.</p>
<p>Arab Spring has been possible because of the development of this empathic consciousness, closely linked to core values such as kinship (extended) and asabiyyah (Ibn KHALDUN).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Art Shostak</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6383</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Shostak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6383</guid>
		<description>While I generally concur, I would tale issue with the use of the word - determine. I believe futurists must be wary of any sort of determinism - economic, ideological, metaphysical, etc. - as this denies agency and would reduce people to being merely passive responders or even only puppets. I hasten to agree that at times and place - given certain circumstances - certain variable far outdo others in their impact on events. This has led great theorists - Ellul, Kahn McLuhan,Marx, etc.-to spotlight one such variable and declare it determinative of this or that macro change in history. Fortunately, other academics, with the passage of time and the completion of exacting research, have taught us the error of such over-statement. All of which is to flag any use by any of us of deterministic thinking. Technology is undoubtedly a MAJOR driver today of change - as it probably has been since, as shown in an iconic sci-fi movie a caveman first threw a bone up into the air (to then become an advanced spaceship)- MAJOR, yes! Determinative? Not ... as it has many other comparatively powerful forces ALSO playing on events.

Art Shostak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I generally concur, I would tale issue with the use of the word &#8211; determine. I believe futurists must be wary of any sort of determinism &#8211; economic, ideological, metaphysical, etc. &#8211; as this denies agency and would reduce people to being merely passive responders or even only puppets. I hasten to agree that at times and place &#8211; given certain circumstances &#8211; certain variable far outdo others in their impact on events. This has led great theorists &#8211; Ellul, Kahn McLuhan,Marx, etc.-to spotlight one such variable and declare it determinative of this or that macro change in history. Fortunately, other academics, with the passage of time and the completion of exacting research, have taught us the error of such over-statement. All of which is to flag any use by any of us of deterministic thinking. Technology is undoubtedly a MAJOR driver today of change &#8211; as it probably has been since, as shown in an iconic sci-fi movie a caveman first threw a bone up into the air (to then become an advanced spaceship)- MAJOR, yes! Determinative? Not &#8230; as it has many other comparatively powerful forces ALSO playing on events.</p>
<p>Art Shostak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Art Shostak</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6381</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Shostak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6381</guid>
		<description>As I have been retired and off campus for the last seven years it is VERY good to read Jay&#039;s account of changes being advanced by Asian graduate students - and I wish more of this had occurred during my 37 years as a campus-based sociologist and futurist. 

The idea of students being up at the podium as &quot;teachers,&quot; and professors sitting in front as occasional &quot;coaches,&quot; is a reform we must champion in high schools and undergraduate education. The &quot;Sage on the Stage&quot; MUST give way to the &quot;Coach on the side&quot; where ever and when ever the maturity of the older adult (commonly the teacher) recommends.

Likewise, the employ of group study is invaluable for nurturing &quot;soft&quot; interpersonal skills of ever-greater value in the new cultures of business and commerce.

Finally, news that Chinese students are bringing to the Middle Kingdom much of what they have learned and experienced while studying here is a critical gain for democracies everywhere (NOT just the USA) as it can be expected that at least some of them came to appreciate - and may have help import into the Chinese culture - the distinctly values obvious on most American campuses, namely, openness to ideas, even unconventional or troublesome ones; respect for people unlike oneself; and, above all, commitment to joining others in the effort to help shape a finer future for all.

Art Shostak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have been retired and off campus for the last seven years it is VERY good to read Jay&#8217;s account of changes being advanced by Asian graduate students &#8211; and I wish more of this had occurred during my 37 years as a campus-based sociologist and futurist. </p>
<p>The idea of students being up at the podium as &#8220;teachers,&#8221; and professors sitting in front as occasional &#8220;coaches,&#8221; is a reform we must champion in high schools and undergraduate education. The &#8220;Sage on the Stage&#8221; MUST give way to the &#8220;Coach on the side&#8221; where ever and when ever the maturity of the older adult (commonly the teacher) recommends.</p>
<p>Likewise, the employ of group study is invaluable for nurturing &#8220;soft&#8221; interpersonal skills of ever-greater value in the new cultures of business and commerce.</p>
<p>Finally, news that Chinese students are bringing to the Middle Kingdom much of what they have learned and experienced while studying here is a critical gain for democracies everywhere (NOT just the USA) as it can be expected that at least some of them came to appreciate &#8211; and may have help import into the Chinese culture &#8211; the distinctly values obvious on most American campuses, namely, openness to ideas, even unconventional or troublesome ones; respect for people unlike oneself; and, above all, commitment to joining others in the effort to help shape a finer future for all.</p>
<p>Art Shostak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans-Cultural Impacts on the Future by Mohan Tikku</title>
		<link>http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6375</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan Tikku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretakes.org/blog/?p=338#comment-6375</guid>
		<description>During my presentation on &#039;Future of Terror&#039; at the WFS in Boston, last year,I had suggested that Pakistan - West Asia region needed to be watched. The countries of this region were characterized by high population growth rates, huge economic disparities and weak State structures. what I had not been able to take into account was the impact zof technology on these societies. So, we had Facebook in addition to the three key factors above, and the result was the Arab Spring&#039;.

Where the &#039;Arab Spring&#039; eventually ends up shall in good measure be determined by the capacity of these societies to assimilate technology and the philosophy of technology that comes with it.

The point that I am trying to make is that Culture and Cultural Choices in our time are determined by technology and technological change. And, as the pace of technological change continues to increase it is bound impact cultural choices (and changes) across the world. That in turn shall impact cultural values and also alter the nature of relationship between society and culture.

(I shall continue the argument in second part later. Meanwhile, shall welcome any comments.)

Mohan K. Tikku
New Delhi /INDIA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During my presentation on &#8216;Future of Terror&#8217; at the WFS in Boston, last year,I had suggested that Pakistan &#8211; West Asia region needed to be watched. The countries of this region were characterized by high population growth rates, huge economic disparities and weak State structures. what I had not been able to take into account was the impact zof technology on these societies. So, we had Facebook in addition to the three key factors above, and the result was the Arab Spring&#8217;.</p>
<p>Where the &#8216;Arab Spring&#8217; eventually ends up shall in good measure be determined by the capacity of these societies to assimilate technology and the philosophy of technology that comes with it.</p>
<p>The point that I am trying to make is that Culture and Cultural Choices in our time are determined by technology and technological change. And, as the pace of technological change continues to increase it is bound impact cultural choices (and changes) across the world. That in turn shall impact cultural values and also alter the nature of relationship between society and culture.</p>
<p>(I shall continue the argument in second part later. Meanwhile, shall welcome any comments.)</p>
<p>Mohan K. Tikku<br />
New Delhi /INDIA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

